These rulemakings, along with the previously adoptedCONS-1 and CONS-2 measures, are intended to fulfill the ARB commitment in the 2003 SIP pertaining to consumer products.ĪRB expects that manufacturers and marketers of consumer products will need to reduce emissions beyond the existing 2003 SIP targets for to meet both the State Ozone Standards and the federal eight-hour standard.Īlthough the 2003 SIP revision is intended to replace the State’s original commitments under the 1994 SIP for the South Coast, the settlement agreement will remain in place until the ARB fulfills its obligations under the agreement.Ģ014-18 MSAA means the Multi-Sector Service Accountability Agreement Apto March 31, 2018.
![sip definition urban sip definition urban](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/f1/0c/4c/f10c4c2d7dc029656a1d73890a06ba13.jpg)
The State of Maryland’s DecemSIP revision sub- mittal includes an enforceable commit- ment to replace those contingency measures reallocated to the control measures portion of the 2005 ROP plan and to submit these additional contin- gency measures by October 31, 2004.
![sip definition urban sip definition urban](https://www.circawanderlust.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/ATL_-A-Hotlanta-Inspired-Playlist.jpg)
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, claiming that the approval relaxed the existing SIP and that we were incorrect in viewing the 2003 SIP revision request as a clarification of the prior SIP.ĮPA is taking final action to approve Maryland’s SeptemSIP revisions. The 2003 SIP was also designed to encourage early reductions by providing an extra allocation for sources that made reductions prior to the program trigger year.Ī citizen’s group filed a petition for judicial review of our 2005 SIP approval in the U.S. The 2003 SIP influenced the long term planning for sources in the region, and utilities began upgrading plants based on the provisions of the SIP years earlier than would have been required under a case-by-case BART determination in a §308 SIP.ĮPA requirements for the 2003 SIP submittal stipulated that, States do not need to show their individual contribution, just the regional contribution.Īs part of their 2003 SIP element submittal, States either addressed 1) all of the 16 Class I Areas of the Colorado Plateau, or 2) all of the 16 Class I Areas of the Colorado Plateau and additional Class I Areas outside of the Colorado Plateau but inside the nine GCVTC state transport region.